labour: have hurt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.54
, group
Weight: 0.54
, input
Weight: 0.53
, sector
Weight: 0.53
, policy
Weight: 0.52
Siblings functional group
Weight: 0.28
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.28
, terrorist organization
Weight: 0.28
, natural gas
Weight: 0.28
, financial institution
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hurt 1.00
hurt 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(labour, have hurt)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(labour, have hurt)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(labour, have hurt)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(labour, hurt)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(labour, have hurt)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(labour, hurt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(labour, have hurt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(labour, hurt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(labour, have hurt)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(labour, hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(labour, have hurt)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(labour, have hurt)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(labour, have hurt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(labour, have hurt)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(labour, have hurt)