:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(beagle, dig)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, dig)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dachshund, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dachshund, dig)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(beagle, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(beagle, dig)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(labrador, dig)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(labrador, dig)
Typical implies Plausible
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(labrador, dig)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dachshund, dig)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(labrador, dig)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(beagle, dig)