lack: be serious problem in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be serious problem in africa 1.00
be serious problem in south africa 0.97
be in africa 0.84
survive in africa 0.82
has state problem 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ability, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lack, be serious problem in africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ability, be in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ability, be in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(poor people, survive in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ability, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(poor people, survive in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(poor people, survive in africa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(laziness, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apathy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(apathy, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lack, be serious problem in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lack, be serious problem in south africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(lack, be serious problem in south africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lack, be serious problem in south africa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in south africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lack, be serious problem in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ability, be in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(poor people, survive in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laziness, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(apathy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lack, be serious problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ability, be in africa)