lad: is dictionary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, book
Weight: 0.47
, boy
Weight: 0.46
, man
Weight: 0.45
Siblings youngster
Weight: 0.33
, young man
Weight: 0.33
, gentleman
Weight: 0.33
, boy scout
Weight: 0.33
, wise man
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dictionary 1.00
is urban dictionary 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(gentleman, is dictionary)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(gentleman, is urban dictionary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(gentleman, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gentleman, is dictionary)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(gentleman, is urban dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(gentleman, is urban dictionary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(lad, is dictionary)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lad, is urban dictionary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(lad, is urban dictionary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lad, is urban dictionary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lad, is urban dictionary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lad, is dictionary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lad, is dictionary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(gentleman, is dictionary)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lad, is dictionary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gentleman, is urban dictionary)