lag: be bad today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, concern
Weight: 0.47
Siblings hiccup
Weight: 0.31
, decline
Weight: 0.31
, friction
Weight: 0.31
, weakness
Weight: 0.31
, volatility
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad today 1.00
is bad now 0.88
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hiccup, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(friction, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(friction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(friction, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hiccup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hiccup, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(decline, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lag, be bad today)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lag, is bad now)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lag, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lag, is bad now)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lag, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lag, is bad now)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lag, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lag, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lag, be bad today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(friction, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hiccup, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(decline, has quality bad)