lake champlain: was named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lake
Weight: 0.89
, water
Weight: 0.70
, new york city
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.56
Siblings lake tahoe
Weight: 0.46
, lake erie
Weight: 0.45
, lake geneva
Weight: 0.44
, lake superior
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named 1.00
was named after samuel champlain 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lake champlain, was named)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lake champlain, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lake champlain, was named)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, was named after samuel champlain)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(lake champlain, was named after samuel champlain)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lake champlain, was named after samuel champlain)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lake champlain, was named after samuel champlain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lake champlain, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)