lake: be drained in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
be drained in winter 1.00
be drained 0.94
is drained 0.94
get drained 0.94
is redman drained 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(wetland, is drained)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lake, be drained in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wetland, is drained)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is drained)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(wetland, is drained)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lake, be drained in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(lake, be drained in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lake, be drained in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lake, be drained in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wetland, is drained)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lake, be drained in winter)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wetland, is drained)