lake: is famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
is famous 1.00
is winnabago famous 1.00
is titicaca famous 1.00
be famous winnebago 0.99
is popular 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lake constance, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lake tahoe, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(great salt lake, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lake tahoe, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(great salt lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(great salt lake, is famous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lake tahoe, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(lake tahoe, is famous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lake constance, is famous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(lake constance, is famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(lake tahoe, is popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lake tahoe, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(lake, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(lake, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(great salt lake, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(lake tahoe, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(lake constance, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake, is famous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lake tahoe, is popular)