lamb: be expensive in usa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.71
, dish
Weight: 0.68
, dairy product
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ewe
Weight: 0.46
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, beef
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in usa 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.90
is expensive uk 0.88
be expensive in australia 0.87
be expensive in zealand 0.83
is uk 0.82
be expensive in new zealand 0.81
be important in ireland 0.77
be expensive in wales 0.76
be imported from zealand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dairy product, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(dish, is uk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be expensive in canada)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(dish, is uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be expensive in canada)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dish, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dairy product, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(dish, is uk)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(lamb, be expensive in usa)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lamb, be expensive in canada)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(lamb, be expensive in canada)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lamb, be expensive in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lamb, be expensive in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in new zealand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lamb, be expensive in new zealand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be expensive in new zealand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lamb, be expensive in wales)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in wales)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(lamb, be expensive in wales)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in wales)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in new zealand)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lamb, be important in ireland)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be important in ireland)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lamb, be important in ireland)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(lamb, be important in ireland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dairy product, be expensive in canada)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dish, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dairy product, be expensive in canada)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dish, is uk)