lamb: be healthier than beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.71
, dish
Weight: 0.68
, dairy product
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ewe
Weight: 0.46
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, beef
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be healthier than beef 1.00
be better than beef 0.94
be more expensive than beef 0.91
be more expensive than meat 0.85
be more expensive than other meat 0.84
be worse than pork 0.81
be expensive compared to meat 0.80
be expensive compared to other meat 0.80
be called meat 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pork, be better than beef)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be called meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pork, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(pork, be better than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pork, be better than beef)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pork, be called meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(pork, be called meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lamb, be called meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(lamb, be better than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lamb, be better than beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lamb, be better than beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be better than beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lamb, be called meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be worse than pork)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lamb, be worse than pork)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lamb, be worse than pork)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lamb, be worse than pork)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(lamb, be called meat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be called meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pork, be better than beef)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pork, be called meat)