lamp: be connected in series

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accessory
Weight: 0.62
, household appliance
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, light source
Weight: 0.59
Siblings light bulb
Weight: 0.72
, halogen
Weight: 0.57
, led
Weight: 0.53
, searchlight
Weight: 0.45
, parlor
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected in series 1.00
be connected in parallel 0.84
be connected in parallel in houses 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(household appliance, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lamp, be connected in series)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(household appliance, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lamp, be connected in series)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(household appliance, be connected in parallel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(household appliance, be connected in parallel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(household appliance, be connected in parallel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(household appliance, be connected in parallel)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(light bulb, be connected in parallel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(led, be connected in series)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(household appliance, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(household appliance, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(led, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(led, be connected in series)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(light bulb, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(light bulb, be connected in parallel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lamp, be connected in series)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lamp, be connected in parallel)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(lamp, be connected in parallel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lamp, be connected in parallel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lamp, be connected in parallel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lamp, be connected in parallel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lamp, be connected in parallel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(lamp, be connected in parallel in houses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(lamp, be connected in parallel in houses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(lamp, be connected in parallel in houses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in parallel in houses)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in parallel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in parallel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lamp, be connected in series)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(household appliance, be connected in parallel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(household appliance, be connected in parallel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(led, be connected in series)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(light bulb, be connected in parallel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(household appliance, be connected in parallel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lamp, be connected in series)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(household appliance, be connected in parallel)