land: is important natural resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.62
, territory
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings crown land
Weight: 0.77
, national forest
Weight: 0.72
, national monument
Weight: 0.69
, national park
Weight: 0.69
, wetland
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is important natural resource 1.00
is natural resource 0.98
be considered important natural resource 0.98
be considered natural resource 0.96
is important resource 0.95
be considered important resource 0.92
be considered as important resource 0.91
be resource 0.91
has quality resource 0.89
be most important resource for humans 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(land, is important natural resource)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(land, is natural resource)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(land, is important resource)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(land, is natural resource)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(land, be considered important resource)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(land, be considered as important resource)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(land, has quality resource)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(land, is natural resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, is important resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(land, is important resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(land, be considered important resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(land, be considered as important resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(land, be considered as important resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(land, be considered important resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(land, is important resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered important resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(land, has quality resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered as important resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(land, is important natural resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(land, is important natural resource)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(land, is important natural resource)