landfill: affect animal life in area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect animal life in area 1.00
affect animals 0.87
affect animals everyday 0.84
affect life 0.84
be important to animals living 0.83
be important to animals 0.83
be for animals 0.82
affect plants animals everyday 0.82
be important to animals living in pond 0.82
be bad for animals 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals living in pond)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals living)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals living)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(water plant, be important to animals living)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(water plant, be important to animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(water plant, be important to animals living in pond)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(water plant, be important to animals living in pond)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(landfill, affect animal life in area)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animals everyday)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect life)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect plants animals everyday)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(landfill, affect animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(landfill, affect animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad for animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(landfill, affect life)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(landfill, affect life)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(landfill, affect animals everyday)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(landfill, affect plants animals everyday)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect life)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(landfill, affect animals everyday)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect animals everyday)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect plants animals everyday)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(landfill, affect plants animals everyday)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(landfill, affect animal life in area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(water plant, be important to animals living)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(water plant, be important to animals)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect animal life in area)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(water plant, be important to animals living in pond)