landfill: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state concern 0.84
be such problem in america 0.78
is issue 0.78
is significant issue 0.75
be problem in africa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(landfill, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(landfill, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(landfill, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(landfill, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(landfill, has state concern)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(landfill, has state concern)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(landfill, has state concern)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(landfill, be problem in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(landfill, be problem in africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state concern)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(landfill, be problem in africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(landfill, is significant issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be problem in africa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(landfill, is significant issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is significant issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(landfill, is significant issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(landfill, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)