landfill: is environmental

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is environmental 1.00
is environmental issue 0.92
is significant environmental issue 0.88
cause pollution 0.78
threat to ecological security 0.78
be considered threat to ecological security 0.77
contribute to pollution 0.76
reduce land pollution 0.76
contribute to thermal pollution 0.75
help conservation resources 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, help conservation resources)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce land pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(recycling, reduce land pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce land pollution)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recycling, help conservation resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(recycling, help conservation resources)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(landfill, is environmental)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental issue)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is significant environmental issue)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(landfill, is environmental issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(landfill, cause pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(landfill, is environmental issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(landfill, is environmental issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(landfill, is significant environmental issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(landfill, cause pollution)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(landfill, cause pollution)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(landfill, cause pollution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(landfill, is significant environmental issue)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(landfill, is significant environmental issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(landfill, is environmental)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(recycling, reduce land pollution)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(recycling, help conservation resources)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, threat to ecological security)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)