landfill: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be expensive 0.99
is more expensive 0.94
be more expensive 0.93
is expensive process 0.87
is cheaper 0.85
be cheaper on end 0.80
be less expensive processing 0.79
is cheap 0.79
is complicated 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(landfill, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(landfill, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(source, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(landfill, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(landfill, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(source, be more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(landfill, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(landfill, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(issue, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(source, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(source, be more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(source, be more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(issue, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(source, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water plant, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be less expensive processing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(source, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(source, be more expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(landfill, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(recycling, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(recycling, be expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water plant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(water plant, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is cheap)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(recycling, be less expensive processing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recycling, be less expensive processing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(landfill, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(landfill, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(source, be more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(source, is more expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(recycling, be expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(water plant, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(recycling, be less expensive processing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(source, is more expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(source, be more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(landfill, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)