landfill: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
is beneficial 0.81
be beneficial 0.80
is dangerous 0.79
be dangerous 0.79
is hazardous 0.79
is poisonous 0.78
reduce effects of pollution 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(project, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(landfill, is harmful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(source, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(landfill, is harmful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(source, be dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(project, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source, be dangerous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(project, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(water plant, is poisonous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(construction site, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is beneficial)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be beneficial)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(project, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(source, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(landfill, is harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(recycling, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(recycling, is beneficial)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(recycling, be beneficial)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(recycling, be beneficial)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(recycling, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(recycling, be dangerous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(construction site, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction site, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(water plant, is poisonous)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(water plant, is poisonous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(landfill, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be dangerous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(landfill, be dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is hazardous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(landfill, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(landfill, is hazardous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(landfill, be dangerous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(landfill, is hazardous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(landfill, is dangerous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(landfill, is hazardous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(landfill, be dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(landfill, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(landfill, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(source, be dangerous)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(project, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(recycling, be beneficial)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(recycling, is beneficial)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(recycling, be dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(water plant, is poisonous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(construction site, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(source, be dangerous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(landfill, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(project, is dangerous)