landfill: is trash bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is trash bad 1.00
be bad 0.77
was called recycling 0.76
be more difficult recycling 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, was called recycling)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(recycling, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recycling, be bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(recycling, was called recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(recycling, was called recycling)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(landfill, is trash bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is trash bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(landfill, is trash bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(recycling, was called recycling)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is trash bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)