landlord: charge for pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, company
Weight: 0.62
, home owner
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tenant
Weight: 0.37
, homeless person
Weight: 0.35
, elderly person
Weight: 0.34
, pet owner
Weight: 0.34
, neighbor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge for pets 1.00
hate pets 0.89
accept pets 0.87
ban pets 0.83
hate cats 0.81
allow dogs 0.79
hate dogs 0.79
allow small dogs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(landlord, charge for pets)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(landlord, hate pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(landlord, hate pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(landlord, hate pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(landlord, hate pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(landlord, hate cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(landlord, hate cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(landlord, hate cats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(landlord, hate cats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(landlord, ban pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(landlord, ban pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(landlord, ban pets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(landlord, hate dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(landlord, hate dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(landlord, allow dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(landlord, hate dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(landlord, ban pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(landlord, hate dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(landlord, allow dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(landlord, allow dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(landlord, allow small dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(landlord, allow dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(landlord, allow small dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(landlord, allow small dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(landlord, allow small dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(landlord, charge for pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(landlord, charge for pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(landlord, charge for pets)