landlord: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, company
Weight: 0.62
, home owner
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tenant
Weight: 0.37
, homeless person
Weight: 0.35
, elderly person
Weight: 0.34
, pet owner
Weight: 0.34
, neighbor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(landlord, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, has quality evil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(landlord, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(neighbor, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(neighbor, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(landlord, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(landlord, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(landlord, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(landlord, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(landlord, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(landlord, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(landlord, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(landlord, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(neighbor, has quality evil)