landmark: be at national park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, property
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.54
Siblings city hall
Weight: 0.69
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.68
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.66
, bridge
Weight: 0.65
, castle
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at national park 1.00
be at park 0.86
be one of france national treasure 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(landmark, be at national park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(thing, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be one of france national treasure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(landmark, be at national park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be one of france national treasure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be one of france national treasure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(landmark, be at national park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be at national park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(landmark, be at national park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be one of france national treasure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(landmark, be at national park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)