lane: be closed over city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, man
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.53
Siblings highway
Weight: 0.32
, stoplight
Weight: 0.32
, bridge
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be closed over city 1.00
be closed over all city 0.98
is closed 0.88
is closing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(highway, is closed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(highway, is closed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(highway, is closed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(lane, be closed over city)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lane, be closed over all city)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lane, be closed over all city)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(lane, be closed over all city)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(lane, is closed)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(lane, is closed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lane, is closed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lane, is closed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lane, be closed over all city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lane, is closing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(lane, is closing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lane, is closing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lane, is closing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lane, be closed over city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lane, be closed over city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lane, be closed over city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(highway, is closed)