language: be dynamic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dynamic 1.00
is dynamic 0.99
be referred to to dynamic 0.87
is powerful 0.75
be powerful 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(english language, is dynamic)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(language, be dynamic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(english language, is powerful)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(language, be dynamic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(english language, is dynamic)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(english language, is powerful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(english language, is powerful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(english language, is dynamic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(english language, is dynamic)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(language, be dynamic)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(english language, is powerful)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(language, be dynamic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(language, be dynamic)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, is dynamic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(language, is dynamic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(language, is powerful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(language, is dynamic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, is dynamic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(language, is powerful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(language, is powerful)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(language, is powerful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(language, be dynamic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(language, be dynamic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(english language, is dynamic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(english language, is powerful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(english language, is dynamic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(language, be dynamic)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(english language, is powerful)