language: be important in literature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in literature 1.00
be important in poetry 0.83
be important in culture 0.79
be like poetry 0.78
be important to culture 0.78
be like poetry taught 0.78
be important in book things 0.78
be used on music manuscripts 0.78
be like poetry taught in school 0.78
be important in writing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(subject, be like poetry taught in school)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(language, be important in literature)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(subject, be like poetry taught)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(language, be important in literature)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(subject, be like poetry)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(language, be important in literature)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(subject, be like poetry)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(subject, be like poetry taught)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(subject, be like poetry taught in school)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(subject, be like poetry)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(subject, be like poetry taught in school)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(subject, be like poetry taught)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(italian language, be used on music manuscripts)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(subject, be like poetry)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(language, be important in literature)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(subject, be like poetry taught)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(language, be important in literature)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(subject, be like poetry taught in school)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(language, be important in literature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(italian language, be used on music manuscripts)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(italian language, be used on music manuscripts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(language, be important in literature)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in poetry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(language, be important in poetry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in writing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(language, be important in writing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(language, be important to culture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in culture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(language, be important in culture)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(language, be important to culture)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(language, be important in poetry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(language, be important in culture)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(language, be important in culture)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(language, be important in writing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(language, be important to culture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(language, be important in poetry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, be important to culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(language, be important in literature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subject, be like poetry)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(subject, be like poetry taught)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(subject, be like poetry taught in school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(italian language, be used on music manuscripts)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subject, be like poetry)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(subject, be like poetry taught)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(language, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(subject, be like poetry taught in school)