language: be like japanese

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like japanese 1.00
be different from english 0.80
be in english 0.79
be called english 0.78
be different from modern english 0.78
sound little like french 0.78
is english important 0.77
be in europe 0.76
differ from modern english 0.76
be vs german 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(subject, is english important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(programming language, be in english)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(english language, be called english)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(english language, be called english)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(programming language, be in english)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(subject, is english important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be in english)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(subject, is english important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(english language, be called english)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(old english, differ from modern english)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(old english, be different from modern english)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(old english, be different from english)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(subject, is english important)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, be like japanese)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(programming language, be in english)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, be like japanese)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(english language, be called english)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, be like japanese)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(old english, be different from english)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(old english, be different from english)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(old english, be different from modern english)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(old english, be different from modern english)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(old english, differ from modern english)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(old english, differ from modern english)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(language, be like japanese)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(language, be different from english)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, be called english)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(language, be different from english)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(language, be different from english)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(language, be called english)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(language, be called english)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(language, be different from english)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(language, be called english)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(english language, be called english)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(programming language, be in english)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(subject, is english important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(old english, be different from english)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(old english, be different from modern english)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(old english, differ from modern english)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(english language, be called english)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(programming language, be in english)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(language, be like japanese)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(subject, is english important)