language: be like japanese

Related concepts

Parents	programming language Weight: 0.85 , english language Weight: 0.85 , sign language Weight: 0.81 , subject Weight: 0.63
Siblings	italian language Weight: 0.79 , chinese language Weight: 0.77 , american sign language Weight: 0.76 , old english Weight: 0.75 , haitian creole Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be like japanese	1.00
be different from english	0.80
be in english	0.79
be called english	0.78
be different from modern english	0.78
sound little like french	0.78
is english important	0.77
be in europe	0.76
differ from modern english	0.76
be vs german	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(subject, is english important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(programming language, be in english) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(english language, be called english) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(english language, be called english)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(programming language, be in english)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(subject, is english important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(programming language, be in english)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(subject, is english important)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(english language, be called english)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(old english, differ from modern english)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(old english, be different from modern english)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(old english, be different from english)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(subject, is english important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(language, be like japanese)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(programming language, be in english) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(language, be like japanese)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(english language, be called english) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(language, be like japanese)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(old english, be different from english) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(old english, be different from english)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(old english, be different from modern english) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(old english, be different from modern english)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(old english, differ from modern english) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(old english, differ from modern english)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(language, be like japanese)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(language, be different from english)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(language, be called english)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(language, be different from english)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(language, be different from english)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(language, be called english)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(language, be called english)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(language, be different from english)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(language, be called english)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(language, be like japanese)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(english language, be called english)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(programming language, be in english)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(subject, is english important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(old english, be different from english)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(old english, be different from modern english)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(old english, differ from modern english)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(english language, be called english)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(programming language, be in english)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(language, be like japanese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(subject, is english important)