language: be related to speak

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
, poetry
Weight: 0.62
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, lisp
Weight: 0.69
, persian
Weight: 0.67
, prolog
Weight: 0.65
, sql
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to speak 1.00
be speak 0.87
be speak or write 0.87
be express through speak word 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(language, be related to speak)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(language, be speak or write)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(language, be speak)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(language, be speak or write)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(language, be express through speak word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(language, be speak or write)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(language, be speak)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(language, be speak)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(language, be express through speak word)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(language, be express through speak word)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(language, be speak or write)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(language, be speak)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(language, be express through speak word)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(language, be related to speak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(language, be related to speak)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(language, be related to speak)