language: is unique

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unique 1.00
be unique to humans 0.85
be unique to beings 0.78
is different 0.76
is dynamic 0.76
be unique to human beings 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(english language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(language, is unique)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sign language, is different)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(language, is unique)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(programming language, is different)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(language, is unique)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(english language, is dynamic)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(language, is unique)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(english language, is unique)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(english language, is dynamic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(programming language, is different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sign language, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(english language, is unique)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sign language, is different)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(english language, is dynamic)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(old english, is different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chinese language, is unique)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chinese language, is different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(english language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(language, is unique)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sign language, is different)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(language, is unique)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(programming language, is different)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(language, is unique)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(english language, is dynamic)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(language, is unique)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(chinese language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chinese language, is unique)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(chinese language, is different)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chinese language, is different)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(old english, is different)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(old english, is different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(language, is unique)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(language, be unique to humans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(language, be unique to humans)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(language, be unique to humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(language, is different)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(language, is dynamic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(language, is different)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(language, is dynamic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(language, is different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, is dynamic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(language, be unique to humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, is dynamic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(language, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(language, is unique)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(english language, is dynamic)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(programming language, is different)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sign language, is different)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(english language, is unique)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chinese language, is different)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(old english, is different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chinese language, is unique)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(english language, is unique)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(english language, is dynamic)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(programming language, is different)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(language, is unique)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sign language, is different)