language: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
is created 0.97
be created 0.96
were created 0.95
get created 0.92
was developed 0.83
was produced 0.81
was invented 0.79
be formed 0.77
was introduced 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sign language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(programming language, is created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(programming language, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sign language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, get created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sign language, was introduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(programming language, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(programming language, is created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(programming language, be created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sign language, was created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(programming language, get created)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(programming language, be formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sign language, was introduced)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sign language, was developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sign language, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was introduced)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(american sign language, was invented)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(old english, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sign language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(programming language, is created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(programming language, be created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, get created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sign language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sign language, was introduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(programming language, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(old english, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(old english, was invented)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(american sign language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(american sign language, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(language, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, were created)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(language, was developed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(language, was produced)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(language, were created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(language, were created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(language, was produced)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(language, were created)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(language, was produced)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(language, was developed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(language, was produced)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(language, was developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(language, was invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(language, was developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, was invented)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(programming language, is created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, be created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sign language, was created)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, get created)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(programming language, be formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sign language, was introduced)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sign language, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(old english, was invented)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(american sign language, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(programming language, is created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sign language, was created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, be created)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, get created)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(programming language, be formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sign language, was introduced)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sign language, was invented)