language: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
be invented 0.98
is invention 0.85
is important invention 0.83
is most important invention 0.81
was developed 0.81
was created 0.79
was introduced 0.77
was originated 0.76
be developed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sign language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sign language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sign language, was introduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(programming language, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(programming language, be invented)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sign language, was invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sign language, was created)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sign language, was introduced)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sign language, was developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(programming language, be developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was invented)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be invented)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was introduced)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sign language, was created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(american sign language, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(old english, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sign language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, was invented)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, was invented)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, was invented)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sign language, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, was invented)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sign language, was introduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, was invented)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(programming language, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(old english, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(old english, was invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(american sign language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(american sign language, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(language, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(language, was developed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(language, was created)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(language, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(language, was developed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(language, was developed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(language, was created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(language, was originated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(language, was developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(language, was originated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(language, was created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(language, was originated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(language, was originated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sign language, was created)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sign language, was introduced)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(programming language, be developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(programming language, be invented)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sign language, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(old english, was invented)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(american sign language, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(programming language, be invented)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sign language, was invented)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sign language, was created)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sign language, was introduced)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(programming language, be developed)