language: was made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made 1.00
is made 0.96
be made 0.95
is made hard 0.83
was produced 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(programming language, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(language, was made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(programming language, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(language, was made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(language, was made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(programming language, is made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(programming language, be made)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(programming language, is made hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be made)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(programming language, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(language, was made)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(programming language, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(language, was made)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(language, was made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(language, was made)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(language, was produced)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(language, was produced)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(language, was produced)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(language, was produced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, was made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(language, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, is made)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, be made)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, is made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, be made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(language, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)