lao: is bad country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.53
, language
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.46
, africa
Weight: 0.41
, script
Weight: 0.38
Siblings chinese language
Weight: 0.33
, lua
Weight: 0.33
, mali
Weight: 0.33
, bengali
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad country 1.00
is country 0.89
is poor country 0.89
has quality bad 0.80
is developing country 0.76
is poor 0.76
be poorest country in asia 0.76
is developed country 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(africa, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(africa, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(africa, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(africa, is poor country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(africa, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(africa, is poor)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(africa, is developing country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(africa, is poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(africa, is country)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(africa, is poor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(africa, is developing country)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mali, is poor country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bengali, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lua, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mali, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mali, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(africa, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lao, is bad country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lao, is bad country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lao, is bad country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lao, is bad country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lao, is bad country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(africa, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lao, is bad country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(africa, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lao, is bad country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mali, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mali, is country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mali, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mali, is poor country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(lua, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lua, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mali, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mali, is poor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(bengali, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bengali, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(lao, is bad country)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lao, is country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is poor country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lao, is country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(lao, is poor country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lao, is poor country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lao, is developed country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lao, is developed country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lao, is poor country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lao, be poorest country in asia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(lao, is developed country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lao, is developing country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(lao, is developing country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lao, is developing country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lao, is developing country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lao, be poorest country in asia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lao, is developed country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lao, be poorest country in asia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(lao, is country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lao, be poorest country in asia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lao, is poor)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lao, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(lao, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(lao, is poor)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lao, is country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lao, is bad country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(africa, is country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(africa, is poor country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(africa, is poor)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mali, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mali, is poor country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lua, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mali, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bengali, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(africa, is country)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(africa, is poor country)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(africa, is poor)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lao, is bad country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing country)