laptop: run hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.72
, electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, computer
Weight: 0.63
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.63
Siblings notebook
Weight: 0.60
, imac
Weight: 0.54
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.43
, personal computer
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
run hot 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(laptop, run hot)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(imac, run hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(laptop, run hot)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(imac, run hot)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(imac, run hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(laptop, run hot)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(laptop, run hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(laptop, run hot)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(laptop, run hot)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(laptop, run hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(laptop, run hot)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(laptop, run hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(laptop, run hot)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(imac, run hot)