large food store: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at cheyenne wyoming 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(large food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(large food store, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(large food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(large food store, be at cheyenne wyoming)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(large food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(large food store, be at cheyenne wyoming)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(large food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(large food store, be at cheyenne wyoming)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(large food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(large food store, be at cheyenne wyoming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(large food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(large food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(large food store, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(large food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(large food store, be at michigan)