large: were families

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.50
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, option
Weight: 0.48
, term
Weight: 0.48
Siblings small
Weight: 0.32
, mammoth
Weight: 0.31
, size
Weight: 0.31
, brown bear
Weight: 0.30
, sea lion
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
were families 1.00
were families important 0.97
were extended families 0.89
were families important in china 0.88
were extended families important 0.88
were extended families important in china 0.84
were families important in ancient china 0.81
were extended families important in ancient china 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(large, were families)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(large, were families important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(large, were families important)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(large, were families important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(large, were extended families)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(large, were families important in china)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(large, were extended families important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(large, were extended families)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(large, were families important in china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(large, were extended families important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(large, were extended families important in china)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(large, were extended families)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(large, were families important in china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(large, were extended families important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(large, were families important in ancient china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(large, were extended families important in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(large, were extended families important in ancient china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(large, were extended families important in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(large, were families important in ancient china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(large, were extended families important in ancient china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(large, were families important in ancient china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(large, were extended families important in ancient china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(large, were families important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(large, were extended families)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(large, were families important in china)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(large, were extended families important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(large, were extended families important in china)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(large, were families important in ancient china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(large, were extended families important in ancient china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(large, were families)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(large, were families) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(large, were families)