lark: have red eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.58
, brand
Weight: 0.37
, device
Weight: 0.36
, joy
Weight: 0.34
, game
Weight: 0.33
Siblings wren
Weight: 0.33
, puffin
Weight: 0.32
, owl
Weight: 0.32
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.32
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red eyes 1.00
has physical part eyes 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(great horned owl, has physical part eyes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(great horned owl, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(great horned owl, has physical part eyes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(snowy owl, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(lark, have red eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lark, has physical part eyes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lark, has physical part eyes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lark, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lark, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lark, have red eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lark, have red eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(great horned owl, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(snowy owl, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lark, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part eyes)