las vegas: be famous for weddings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.79
, nevada
Weight: 0.72
, tv show
Weight: 0.71
, new york
Weight: 0.70
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.38
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.37
, san francisco
Weight: 0.37
, smallville
Weight: 0.37
, san diego
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous for weddings 1.00
is famous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(nevada, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new york, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(new york, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(nevada, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is famous)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is famous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(new york, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(smallville, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(nevada, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new york, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(san francisco, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is famous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, is famous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(smallville, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(smallville, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(las vegas, be famous for weddings)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(las vegas, is famous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(las vegas, is famous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(los angeles, is famous)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, is famous)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(nevada, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(san francisco, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smallville, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(los angeles, is famous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, is famous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(las vegas, be famous for weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(nevada, is famous)