las vegas: is cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.79
, nevada
Weight: 0.72
, tv show
Weight: 0.71
, new york
Weight: 0.70
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.38
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.37
, san francisco
Weight: 0.37
, smallville
Weight: 0.37
, san diego
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheap 1.00
is real estate cheap 0.80
is estate cheap 0.79
is expensive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(nevada, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(las vegas, is cheap)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(new york, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(las vegas, is cheap)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(las vegas, is cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(nevada, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(new york, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is cheap)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(new york, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(smallville, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(nevada, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(new york, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(san francisco, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(san jose, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(san jose, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(san diego, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(san diego, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(smallville, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(smallville, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(las vegas, is cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(las vegas, is expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(las vegas, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(las vegas, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nevada, is cheap)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new york, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smallville, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san francisco, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san jose, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(san diego, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nevada, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new york, is expensive)