laser: be more expensive than red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.67
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
, instrument
Weight: 0.64
Siblings diode
Weight: 0.35
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.35
, optics
Weight: 0.35
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than red 1.00
is more expensive 0.92
be better than red 0.91
be brighter than red 0.83
be stronger than red lasers 0.80
has color red 0.77
is more powerful 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(laser, be more expensive than red)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(laser, be better than red)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(laser, be better than red)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laser, be better than red)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, is more expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(laser, is more expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(laser, is more expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(laser, be brighter than red)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(laser, be brighter than red)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(laser, be brighter than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(laser, be better than red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(laser, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(laser, be brighter than red)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(laser, is more powerful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(laser, is more powerful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(laser, be stronger than red lasers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(laser, is more powerful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(laser, has color red)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laser, is more powerful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(laser, be stronger than red lasers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(laser, has color red)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(laser, has color red)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(laser, be stronger than red lasers)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(laser, has color red)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(laser, be stronger than red lasers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(laser, be more expensive than red)