laser: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.67
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
, instrument
Weight: 0.64
Siblings diode
Weight: 0.35
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.35
, optics
Weight: 0.35
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
be more expensive than red 0.92
is more powerful 0.77
be better than red 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(laser, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(laser, be more expensive than red)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(laser, be more expensive than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(laser, be better than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(laser, be better than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laser, be better than red)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(laser, be better than red)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(laser, is more powerful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(laser, is more powerful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(laser, is more powerful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laser, is more powerful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(laser, is more expensive)