last supper: be in poor condition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents supper
Weight: 0.67
, painting
Weight: 0.61
, work
Weight: 0.59
, meal
Weight: 0.59
, invitation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings brunch
Weight: 0.36
, dinner
Weight: 0.36
, breakfast
Weight: 0.35
, lunch
Weight: 0.34
, salad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in poor condition 1.00
be in condition 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supper, be in condition)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(last supper, be in poor condition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(last supper, be in poor condition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(supper, be in poor condition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(supper, be in condition)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(supper, be in poor condition)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(supper, be in condition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(last supper, be in poor condition)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supper, be in condition)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(last supper, be in poor condition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(last supper, be in poor condition)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(last supper, be in condition)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(last supper, be in condition)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(last supper, be in condition)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(last supper, be in condition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(last supper, be in poor condition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(last supper, be in poor condition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(supper, be in poor condition)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(supper, be in condition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(supper, be in condition)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(last supper, be in poor condition)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(supper, be in poor condition)