:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(polyester, is hot)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(latex, is hot)
Similarity expansion
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(latex, is damn hot)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(latex, is damn hot)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latex, is damn hot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(latex, is damn hot)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(latex, is hot)
Typical implies Plausible
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(latex, is hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(latex, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(polyester, is hot)