latin america: have more developed trading practices than africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south africa
Weight: 0.79
, north america
Weight: 0.78
, africa
Weight: 0.76
, south america
Weight: 0.73
, european union
Weight: 0.72
Siblings puerto rico
Weight: 0.73
, central america
Weight: 0.70
, argentina
Weight: 0.68
, peru
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more developed trading practices than africa 1.00
is less developed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(south america, is less developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(latin america, is less developed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)