latin america: is developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south africa
Weight: 0.79
, north america
Weight: 0.78
, africa
Weight: 0.76
, south america
Weight: 0.73
, european union
Weight: 0.72
Siblings puerto rico
Weight: 0.73
, central america
Weight: 0.70
, argentina
Weight: 0.68
, peru
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed 1.00
is less developed 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(south america, is less developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(south america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(south america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(peru, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(peru, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(peru, is developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(latin america, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(latin america, is less developed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south america, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(peru, is developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south america, is developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)