latin america: is less developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south africa
Weight: 0.79
, north america
Weight: 0.78
, africa
Weight: 0.76
, south america
Weight: 0.73
, european union
Weight: 0.72
Siblings puerto rico
Weight: 0.73
, central america
Weight: 0.70
, argentina
Weight: 0.68
, peru
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less developed 1.00
is developed 0.90
have more developed trading practices than africa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(south america, is less developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(south america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(south america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(peru, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(peru, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(peru, is developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(latin america, is less developed)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(latin america, is developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(latin america, have more developed trading practices than africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south america, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(peru, is developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south america, is developed)