laughing: is frowned upon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.67
, behavior
Weight: 0.57
, joke
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, character
Weight: 0.53
Siblings laugh
Weight: 0.37
, talking
Weight: 0.36
, smiling
Weight: 0.35
, laughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frowned upon 1.00
is frowned 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(talking, is frowned)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(laughing, is frowned upon)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(laughing, is frowned)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laughing, is frowned)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(laughing, is frowned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laughing, is frowned upon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(talking, is frowned upon)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(talking, is frowned)