laughter: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents joke
Weight: 0.64
, emotion
Weight: 0.61
, sound
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, expression
Weight: 0.57
Siblings laugh
Weight: 0.49
, laughing
Weight: 0.35
, joy
Weight: 0.34
, applause
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
is biological function 0.78
has quality good 0.78
qualify as function 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expression, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality function)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expression, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(expression, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expression, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(laughter, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(laughter, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(laughter, is biological function)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(laughter, qualify as function)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(laughter, is biological function)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(laughter, qualify as function)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(laughter, is biological function)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(laughter, qualify as function)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(laughter, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(laughter, qualify as function)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(laughter, is biological function)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(laughter, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(laughter, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(laughter, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)