lava: be hotter than fire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, brand
Weight: 0.46
, product
Weight: 0.46
Siblings comet
Weight: 0.34
, meteor
Weight: 0.34
, nebula
Weight: 0.33
, boulder
Weight: 0.32
, quasar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hotter than fire 1.00
start forest fire 0.76
get hot 0.76
is hot 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(quasar, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(quasar, is hot)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(quasar, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(lava, be hotter than fire)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(lava, start forest fire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lava, start forest fire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lava, start forest fire)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lava, start forest fire)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lava, get hot)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(lava, get hot)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lava, is hot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lava, get hot)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(lava, is hot)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lava, get hot)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lava, is hot)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(lava, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lava, be hotter than fire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lava, be hotter than fire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lava, be hotter than fire)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(quasar, is hot)