lava: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, brand
Weight: 0.46
, product
Weight: 0.46
Siblings comet
Weight: 0.34
, meteor
Weight: 0.34
, nebula
Weight: 0.33
, boulder
Weight: 0.32
, quasar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be deadly 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(quasar, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(comet, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(quasar, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(quasar, is dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(comet, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(comet, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(lava, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(lava, be deadly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lava, be deadly)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lava, be deadly)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lava, be deadly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lava, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lava, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quasar, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lava, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(comet, is dangerous)