law firm: be structured as partnerships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accounting firm
Weight: 0.75
, partner
Weight: 0.68
, business
Weight: 0.68
, firm
Weight: 0.61
Siblings company
Weight: 0.68
, lobbyist
Weight: 0.53
, software company
Weight: 0.36
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be structured as partnerships 1.00
is partnerships 0.92
use partnership model 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(law firm, be structured as partnerships)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(accounting firm, is partnerships)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(law firm, be structured as partnerships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(law firm, be structured as partnerships)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(law firm, is partnerships)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(law firm, use partnership model)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(law firm, is partnerships)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(law firm, is partnerships)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(law firm, is partnerships)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(law firm, use partnership model)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(law firm, use partnership model)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(law firm, use partnership model)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be structured as partnerships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(law firm, be structured as partnerships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(accounting firm, is partnerships)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(law firm, be structured as partnerships)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(accounting firm, is partnerships)