law firm: use names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accounting firm
Weight: 0.75
, partner
Weight: 0.68
, business
Weight: 0.68
, firm
Weight: 0.61
Siblings company
Weight: 0.68
, lobbyist
Weight: 0.53
, software company
Weight: 0.36
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use names 1.00
have names 0.95
use last names 0.93
have two names 0.89
have three names 0.88
be named after names 0.86
be named after last names 0.82
have horrible names 0.81
have twice name 0.78
have twice same name 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(law firm, use names)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have names)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(law firm, use last names)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have two names)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have three names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be named after names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be named after last names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have twice same name)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(law firm, have names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(law firm, use last names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(law firm, have two names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(law firm, have twice name)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(law firm, have names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(law firm, have three names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(law firm, have horrible names)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(law firm, have names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(law firm, have twice same name)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(law firm, be named after names)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(law firm, be named after last names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(law firm, have two names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(law firm, use last names)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(law firm, have horrible names)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(law firm, have three names)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(law firm, have twice same name)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(law firm, have two names)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(law firm, be named after names)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(law firm, be named after last names)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(law firm, use last names)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(law firm, have twice name)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(law firm, have three names)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(law firm, have horrible names)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(law firm, have twice same name)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(law firm, be named after names)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(law firm, be named after last names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(law firm, use names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(law firm, use names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(law firm, use names)